Roadway Package System, Inc

10 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Jacob E. Decker and Sons

    569 F.2d 357 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that "new evidence" discovered after trial does not warrant a new trial when its only purpose would be to impeach a witness
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Amber Delivery Serv., Inc.

    651 F.2d 57 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 26 times
    In Amber and Seven-Up, we found the fact of truck ownership a significant (though not in itself controlling) factor suggesting independent contractor status.
  4. Air Transit, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    679 F.2d 1095 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 8 times
    Finding in independent contractor analysis that "drivers receive no type of training and are not given road tests to evaluate their driving skills"
  5. National L. Rel. B. v. Sunrise L. Trim

    241 F.2d 620 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 26 times

    No. 115, Docket 24222. Argued January 9, 1957. Decided February 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Samuel M. Singer, Nancy M. Sherman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph T. King, Alexander Eltman, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit

  8. United Steelworkers of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    386 F.2d 981 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 4 times

    No. 20821. Argued September 22, 1967. Decided October 24, 1967. Mr. Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Elliott Bredhoff and George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Lawrence M. Joseph, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marcus W. Sisk, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, and McGOWAN

  9. Section 10-13 - Appropriations; accounts; reports

    Haw. Rev. Stat. § 10-13   Cited 2 times

    Moneys appropriated by the legislature for the office shall be payable by the director of finance, upon vouchers approved by the board, or by any officer elected or appointed by the board and authorized by the board to approve such vouchers on behalf of the board. All moneys received by or on behalf of the board shall be deposited with the director of finance and kept separate from moneys in the state treasury; except that any moneys received from the federal government or from private contributions

  10. Section 11-19 - Registration from one county to another

    Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-19

    Whenever a registered voter changes residence from one county to another, the person shall notify the clerk and change the registration to the proper county by the appropriate registration deadline; provided that no change of registration shall be allowed after the close of registration for an election except pursuant to section 11-21(c). Thereupon, if the person applying is legally qualified to register, the clerk shall accept the registration and shall immediately thereafter forward to the clerk