Roadway Express, Inc.

Interstate Circuit v. U.S.
306 U.S. 208 (1939) Cited 514 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"
Medline Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
593 F.2d 788 (7th Cir. 1979) Cited 18 times
In Medline Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 593 F.2d 788, 795 (7th Cir. 1979), we described "extraordinary circumstances" as a "complete disregard for sworn testimony, coupled with a tongue in cheek characterization of those utterances."
Heinrich Motors, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
403 F.2d 145 (2d Cir. 1968) Cited 30 times
In Heinrich Motors, Inc. v. NLRB, 403 F.2d 145, 148 (2d Cir. 1968), we characterized the General Counsel's burden as that of "going forward with evidence that the employee has not wilfully incurred a loss of earnings," and cited Mastro Plastics for the proposition.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.
258 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1958) Cited 18 times
Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."