§

ROAD SPRINKLER FITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 669, UA., AFL-CIO (Firetrol Protection Systems, Inc.)

365 NLRB No. 83 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
ROAD SPRINKLER FITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 669, UA., AFL-CIO (Firetrol Protection Systems, Inc.)

12 Cited authorities

  1. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 984 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  2. BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB

    536 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 314 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts

  3. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  4. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 327 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. South Prairie Constr. v. Operating Engineers

    425 U.S. 800 (1976)   Cited 223 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that appeals court usurped role of NLRB by reversing Board's legal conclusion and proceeding to decide issue of fact that should be decided by Board in the first instance

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters

    429 U.S. 507 (1977)   Cited 140 times
    Stating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    447 U.S. 490 (1980)   Cited 66 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Longshoremen, 447 U.S. 490 (1980) (ILA I), we reviewed the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion that the Rules and their enforcement constituted unlawful secondary activity under §§ 8(b)(4)(B) and 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4) (B) and 158(e).

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers

    400 U.S. 297 (1971)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work

  9. Int. U. of Operating Eng. v. N.L.R.B

    518 F.2d 1040 (D.C. Cir. 1975)   Cited 50 times
    Finding the common management prong satisfied by several interchanges of higher-level managers and officers between the corporations

  10. Local 32B-32J, Serv. Emp. Intern. v. N.L.R.B

    68 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an agreement which, as applied, would “extend the contract to reach outside the contractual bargaining unit” violates § 8(e)

  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,219 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”