§

Riverboat Services of Indiana

345 N.L.R.B. 1286 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Riverboat Services of Indiana

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Bakers of Paris, Inc.

    929 F.2d 1427 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 24 times
    Noting that "burden of proving supervisory status rests upon the party asserting it"

  7. National Labor Rel. v. Taylor Mach. Prods

    136 F.3d 507 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 96-6047 Argued: December 11, 1997 Decided and Filed: February 18, 1998 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 ARGUED: Anthony A. Asher, SULLIVAN, WARD, BONE, TYLER ASHER, Southfield, Michigan, for Respondent. David Habenstreit, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Ronald S. Lederman, Scott D. Norton, SULLIVAN, WARD, BONE, TYLER ASHER, Southfield, Michigan, for Respondent. David Habenstreit, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, OFFICE

  8. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"

  9. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  10. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction