§

Rish Equipment Co.

173 N.L.R.B. 943 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Rish Equipment Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 301 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  4. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rish Equipment Co.

    359 F.2d 391 (4th Cir. 1966)   Cited 2 times

    No. 10168. Argued February 11, 1966. Decided April 7, 1966. George B. Dreisen, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack and Thomas Canafax, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C. (Frederick F. Holroyd, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations