§

Ripon Foods, Inc.

118 N.L.R.B. 536 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
Ripon Foods, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  2. Pedersen v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    234 F.2d 417 (2d Cir. 1956)   Cited 15 times

    No. 273, Docket 23888. Argued March 14, 1956. Decided June 7, 1956. Emanuel Friedman, New York City (Sidney S. Grant, Grant Angoff, Boston, Mass., of counsel on the brief), for petitioner. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman and Rose Mary Filipowicz, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Myron P. Gordon, New York City, for intervenor. Before FRANK, LUMBARD and WATERMAN

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Newark Morning L

    120 F.2d 262 (3d Cir. 1941)   Cited 24 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Newark Morning L. Co., 3 Cir., 120 F.2d 262, 268, 137 A.L.R. 849, this court, passing upon the right of an employee to reinstatement with back pay stated its conclusion that rights under the Act were public rights, though expressly reserving judgment upon the question whether the law of New Jersey might afford the claimant in the cited case a forum for the redress of her private grievances.

  4. Virginia Elec. Power v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    115 F.2d 414 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 19 times
    In Virginia Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 115 F.2d 414, we rejected the similar claim of the employer that its gas department should be regarded as purely local and separate from its interstate electric operations, and we held that wage controversies or unfair labor practices in one department of such a business would have repercussions in other departments, and that disputes affecting the interstate commerce in which the company was engaged would be avoided only if the rights of all the employees were properly safeguarded.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shawnee Milling Co.

    184 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 9 times

    No. 3906. August 4, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, and Abraham H. Maller, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. Kenneth Abernathy, Shawnee, Okla. (G.C. Abernathy, Shawnee, Okla., on the brief) for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding under Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Board Act, 29 U.S.C

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Santa Cruz Fruit P

    91 F.2d 790 (9th Cir. 1937)   Cited 12 times

    No. 8432. July 31, 1937. Upon Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Company, on petition for the enforcement of orders of the Board. Orders modified, and, as modified, ordered enforced. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, Jerome I. Macht, Joseph Rosenfarb, A. Norman Somers, and Philip Levy, Attys., Nat. Labor Relations Board, all of Washington

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.

    132 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1942)   Cited 5 times

    No. 10031. December 11, 1942. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition of National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of cease and desist order directed against Weyerhaeuser Timber Company, Clemons Branch, predicated on allegedly discriminatory discharge of two employees of the latter. Order enforced. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen., Counsel, Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Hilda D. Shea, Thomas E. Shroyer, and

  8. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

    89 F.2d 1000 (1st Cir. 1936)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 3189, 3190. May 13, 1936. Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; Elisha H. Brewster, Judge. On motion for leave to file petition for rehearing. Motion denied. For former opinion, see 88 F.2d 154, which affirmed decree in 15 F. Supp. 915. Charles Fahy and Robert B. Watts, both of Washington, D.C., for appellants. Before BINGHAM, WILSON, and MORTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The appellants have moved for leave to file a petition for rehearing