§

Rinke Pontiac Co.

216 N.L.R.B. 239 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Rinke Pontiac Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

    388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Interboro Contractors, Inc., 388 F.2d 495, 500 (2d Cir. 1967), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated that the efforts of an individual employee acting alone to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed "concerted," and thus protected, at least when the individual's interpretation of the agreement has a reasonable basis.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Buddies Supermarkets, Inc.

    481 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 34 times
    In Buddies Supermarkets, employee Smith was discharged for causing dissention among his co-workers after failing to gain a more favorable contract for himself. The ALJ held that the employee was discharged for engaging in section 7 protected concerted activity, and the Board affirmed.

  4. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  5. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    407 F.2d 1357 (4th Cir. 1969)   Cited 38 times
    Noting that, while timing is a factor, "the thrust of Exchange Parts is the condemnation of granting such benefits with the purpose of affecting the outcome of an election"

  6. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

  7. Signal Oil and Gas Company v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 338 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that a non-union employee engaged in protected concerted activity

  8. N.L.R.B. v. West Side Carpet Cleaning Co.

    329 F.2d 758 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 21 times

    No. 15147. March 31, 1964. Leo N. McGuire, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Armond D. Arnson, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent, Rocker, Kahn, Kleinman, Annan Morton S. Zaller, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief. Before MILLER, CECIL, and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations

  9. Southwest Latex Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    426 F.2d 50 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 14 times

    No. 27649. May 12, 1970. Willis Witt, Houston, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., John Luis Antonio de Passalacqua, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before THORNBERRY, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges. DYER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Southwest Latex Corporation asks this court to review and set aside a National Labor Relations Board order which found that Southwest Latex engaged in

  10. Cusano v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    190 F.2d 898 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 10404. Argued May 22, 1951. Filed August 16, 1951. Samuel J. Davidson, Hoboken, N.J. (DeFazio, Davidson DeFazio, Hoboken, N.J., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Washington, D.C., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This case is