Riley Stoker Corp.
3 Cited authorities
Interstate Circuit v. U.S.
306 U.S. 208 (1939) Cited 514 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"
Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.
309 U.S. 350 (1940) Cited 318 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
N.L.R.B. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company
326 F.2d 509 (6th Cir. 1964) Cited 22 timesNos. 15014, 15015. January 14, 1964. Stephen B. Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga. (Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., William E. Boston, Lawrenceburg, Tenn., on the brief), for respondent. Before WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge