ยง

Riggs Distler & Co., Inc.

141 N.L.R.B. 721 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Riggs Distler & Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  2. United Brick Clay Workers v. Deena Artware

    198 F.2d 637 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 49 times
    In Deena Artware, "Whoever shall be injured" was applicable to the primary employer upon which the union attempted to force their acceptance as representatives of the primary employer's employees.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  4. National Labor Rel. v. Pac. Intermountain

    228 F.2d 170 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 24 times

    No. 15318. December 23, 1955. Rehearing Denied February 7, 1956. Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for petitioner. Harry L. Browne, Kansas City, Mo. (Raymond F. Beagle, Jr., and Spencer, Fane, Britt Browne, Kansas City, Mo., were with him on the brief), for respondent Pac

  5. Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Wkrs.

    203 F. Supp. 288 (D. Md. 1962)   Cited 12 times
    Looking to four-month requirement of LMRDA ยง 101 as "authoritative expression of Congressional labor policy" and "prime source" for formulating federal law for exhaustion

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gluek Brewing Co.

    144 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 26 times
    In Glueck, the court recognized that an independent contractor could not be held liable for an unfair labor practice if it was "an entirely innocent and unconscious instrument" of the perpetrator of the practice, but "[w]here an independent contractor knowingly participates in the effectuation of an unfair practice, it places itself within the orbit of the Board's corrective jurisdiction."

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant

    207 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 9 times

    No. 12985. September 15, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Morris A. Solomon, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Raymond S. Smathurst, Washington, D.C., J.P. Stirling, Roscoe Watts, John T. Casey, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before HEALY, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, requests enforcement

  9. N.C. Finishing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.2d 714 (4th Cir. 1943)   Cited 10 times

    No. 5005. February 17, 1943. On petition to Review and Set Aside and on Request for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the North Carolina Finishing Company to review a cease and desist order issued against it by the National Labor Relations Board which order further directed the reinstatement with back pay of a discharged employee. Order of the board affirmed and judgment to be entered enforcing the order. Before PARKER, SOPER, and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. Walter