§

Richfield Oil Corp.

110 N.L.R.B. 356 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Richfield Oil Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  2. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949)   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"

  3. W.W. Cross Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    174 F.2d 875 (1st Cir. 1949)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that " 'wages' " in the NLRA "embraces within its meaning direct and immediate economic benefits flowing from the employment relationship covers a group insurance program"

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. J.H. Allison Co.

    165 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 44 times

    No. 10411. January 26, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board, for enforcement of its order directing J.H. Allison Co. to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively concerning so-called "merit wage increases" with a labor union, as exclusive representative and bargaining agent of its production workers and to grant no merit wage increases to such employees without prior consultation with the union

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Black-Clawson Co.

    210 F.2d 523 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 14 times
    In NLRB v. Hearst Publications, supra, we sustained the Board's finding that newsboys were "employees" rather than independent contractors.

  6. National Labor Bd. v. Retail Clerks Inter

    211 F.2d 759 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 12 times

    No. 12434. April 2, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Robert G. Johnson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Louis S. Penfield, Albert M. Dryer, Attys., N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Roland C. Davis, J.D. Burdick, Carroll, Davis Freidenrich, San Francisco, Cal., S.G. Lippman, Gen. Counsel, Retail Clerk's International Ass'n, Chicago, Ill., James F. Galliano, Oakland, Cal., for respondents

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Dalton Tel. Co.

    187 F.2d 811 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 14 times
    In Dalton Telephone, however, the court strongly suggested that the company's insistence on the union registration was simply a ploy to avoid reducing to writing an agreement to which the parties had already agreed.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bemis Bro. Bag Co.

    206 F.2d 33 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 4 times

    No. 14020. August 6, 1953. Norton J. Come, Attorney, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, and Ruth V. Reel, Attorney, N.L.R.B., all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., Brewer Dixon, Talladega, Ala., Dixon, Wooten Boyett, Talladega, Ala., for respondent. Before BORAH, RUSSELL, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order directing