369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Holding that a challenge to the composition of the National Labor Relations Board under the Recess Appointments Clause was not jurisdictional and could be forfeited if not raised to the Board
Holding that the denial of enforcement on the basis that the Board lacked a proper quorum did not deprive the Board of jurisdiction to consider the case anew
Concluding that substantial evidence supported the NLRB's finding that labor organization "did not have actual or constructive knowledge" of unfair labor practices
Holding "that a union is entitled to inspect the data relied on by an employer and does not have to accept the employer's bald assertions or generalized figures at face value"