Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Pullman-Standard v. Swint

Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison

Holding that to leave the employershort-handed would involve costs to the employer “in the form of lost efficiency”

Ansonia Bd. of Educ. v. Philbrook

Holding an accommodation is reasonable where it "allow the individual to observe fully religious holy days and requires him only to give up compensation for a day that he did not in fact work"

Tiano v. Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc.

Holding that the employee's religious belief-that she "had a calling from God" to take a pilgrimage to Medjugorje, Yugoslavia in October-was not in conflict with Dillard's "no-leave policy" for October through December because "the timing of the trip was a personal preference and not part of her calling"

Heller v. EBB Auto Co.

Holding that the plaintiff established the second element of his prima facie case for failure to accommodate his “religious practice of attending the ceremony in which his wife and children were converted to Judaism,” where the plaintiff's supervisor “knew” that he was Jewish, “knew” that his “wife was studying for conversion,” and “when [the plaintiff] requested the time off, he informed the [supervisor] why he needed to miss work”

Redmond v. Gaf Corp.

Holding employee's statement informing employer that "I [am] not able to work on Saturday because of my religious obligation" was sufficient

Turpen v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.