§

Richard Lawson Excavating, Inc.

06-CA-033928 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 11, 2005)
Richard Lawson Excavating, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB

    536 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 314 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.3d 1284 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 96 times
    Holding that "Rule 408 does not exclude evidence of alleged threats to retaliate for protected activity when the statements occurred during negotiations focused on the protected activity and the evidence serves to prove liability either for making, or later acting upon, the threats" because the evidence was not introduced in order to prove the validity of the grievance which served as the subject of the negotiations

  4. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Nat. Lbr. Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Deferring to agency's resolution of contradictory evidence

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

    201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"

  6. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Wis-Pak Foods, Inc.

    125 F.3d 518 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 7 times
    Upholding the NLRB's determination that the post-election grant of a wage increase was motivated by a desire to erode union support and was therefore an unfair labor practice

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Price's Pic-Pac Supermarkets

    707 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that an objection "to each and every provision of the Remedy" did not pass muster under section 10(e)

  9. N.L.R.B. v. McAllister Bros., Inc.

    819 F.2d 439 (4th Cir. 1987)   Cited 9 times

    No. 86-3860. Argued January 6, 1987. Decided May 20, 1987. Kenneth A. Margolis (Dretzin Kauff, P.C., New York City, Ober, Kaler, Grimes Shriver, on brief), for respondents. Richard A. Cohen, N.L.R.B. (Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. James M. Altman (Schulman Altman, New York City, on

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hicks Oils & Hicksgas, Inc.

    942 F.2d 1140 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times

    No. 89-2795. Argued January 14, 1991. Decided September 4, 1991. Barbara A. Atkin, Judith P. Flower, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, William A. Baudler (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph H. Solien, N.L.R.B., Region 14, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Gary A. Wincek (argued), William L. Becker, Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, Ill., Nancy M. Watkins, Wilburn, Suggs Watkins, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent

  11. Rule 408 - Compromise Offers and Negotiations

    Fed. R. Evid. 408   Cited 4,454 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that premature deliberations constituted an internal jury influence subject to the post-verdict restrictions of Rule 606(b)

  12. Section 2520 - Recovery of civil damages authorized

    18 U.S.C. § 2520   Cited 1,369 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Permitting recovery of actual and punitive damages, as well as a reasonable attorney's fee and other costs of litigation reasonably incurred