§

Rhino Northwest, LLC

369 N.L.R.B. 25 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
Rhino Northwest, LLC

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Hyatt Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    939 F.2d 361 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 98 times
    Upholding Section 8 violations, under Birch Run's general layoff theory, where three union supporters and nine other employees were discharged over a seven month period

  4. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  5. Tellepsen Pipeline Services Co. v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.3d 554 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 26 times
    Explaining the standard for unlawful discharge

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Bus Transit

    577 F.3d 467 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 16 times
    Interpreting similar language in 29 C.F.R. § 101.10 as meaning "that the Board's procedures are to be controlled by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as far as practicable" (cleaned up)

  7. Ready Mixed Concrete v. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd.

    81 F.3d 1546 (10th Cir. 1996)   Cited 24 times
    Imputing supervisor's knowledge of employee's union activities to company where supervisor had anti-union animus, but acknowledging that decision-maker admitted he probably knew of employee's union activities

  8. Three D, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    629 F. App'x 33 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that something "violates [the NLRA's interference provision] if it would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their [NLRA rights]"

  9. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  10. Rhino Nw., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    867 F.3d 95 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 1 times

    No. 16-1089 C/w 16-1115 08-11-2017 RHINO NORTHWEST, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 15, Intervenor Timothy A. Garnett argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Heidi Kuns Durr, St. Louis, MO. Greg P. Lauro, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda