RGC (USA) Mineral Sand

20 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener

    405 U.S. 117 (1972)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner
  6. S. Constr. Co. v. Gen. Elec. Co.

    390 U.S. 955 (1968)   Cited 89 times
    Relying on § 10(b) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (b)
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Unbelievable, Inc.

    71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Unbelievable, Inc., 71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995), we upheld the Board's finding that the employer "engaged in unfair labor practices by eavesdropping on private conversations between employees and [a] Union representative," which occurred in the employee break room.
  8. Northern Wire Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    887 F.2d 1313 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 88-3278, 88-3461. Argued June 6, 1989. Decided October 26, 1989. Jack D. Walker, Susan C. Sheeran, Melli, Walker, Pease Ruhly, Madison, Wis., for Northern Wire Corporation. Aileen A. Armstrong, Collis Suzanne Stocking, Robert F. Mace, N.L.R.B. Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph A. Szabo, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, Wis., for N.L.R.B. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUDAHY, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Pope Maintenance Corp.

    573 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 34 times

    No. 77-1826. May 26, 1978. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Michael Winer, Supervisor, Jessie Etelson, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John M. Capron, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before HILL, RUBIN and VANCE, Circuit Judges. VANCE, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on application of the National Labor Relations

  10. Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    523 F.2d 814 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 37 times

    No. 74-2325. Argued June 10, 1975. Decided October 1, 1975. As Amended October 15, 1975. W. Bruce Baird, Matthew R. Westfall, Middleton, Reutlinger Baird, Louisville, Ky., Jay S. Siegel, Siegel, O'Connor Kainen, Hartford, Conn., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Hope P. Zelasko, Emil C. Farkas, Regional Director, 9th Region, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Herbert L. Segal, Irwin H. Cutler, Jr., Segal, Isenberg, Sales, Stewart Nutt