§

Revco Drug Centers of the West, Inc.

188 N.L.R.B. 73 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Revco Drug Centers of the West, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Intn'l United A., A. A. v. N.L.R.B

    392 F.2d 801 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times
    Expressing skepticism of “employees testifying under the eye of the company officials about events which occurred almost a year before”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Southwire Company

    429 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 20008, 21784. July 27, 1970. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 28, 1970. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel Paul Elkind, J.L.A. de Passalacqua, Solomon I. Hirsch, Alfred Brummell, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Swift, Currie, McGhee Hiers, Frank M. Swift, Albert E. Phillips, Walter O. Lambeth, Jr., David M. Vaughan, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents. Before SIMPSON, MORGAN and

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Truck Rental

    239 F.2d 422 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 21 times
    Voiding ballot with a capital "H" on it

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Laars Engineers, Inc.

    332 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 9 times

    No. 18994. June 8, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hill, Farrer Burrill, Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before JERTBERG, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. The case is before us on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter the Board), for enforcement

  6. West Texas Utilities v. National Labor R. BD

    184 F.2d 233 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor R. Bd., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 179, 184 F.2d 233, 239, the District of Columbia Court said: "The failure of union officers to comply with 9(h) does not in any way relieve an employer of the paramount obligation to bargain collectively in good faith.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Exchange Parts Company

    304 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19106. June 22, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Karl Mueller, Harold E. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. This case presents the question whether it is an unfair labor practice for an employer to