Retail Stores Employees Union, Local 400, Etc.

19 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Thornhill v. Alabama

    310 U.S. 88 (1940)   Cited 1,704 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights
  3. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  4. Rochester Tel. Corp. v. U.S.

    307 U.S. 125 (1939)   Cited 531 times
    Rejecting the "negative order doctrine"
  5. Trade Comm'n v. Morton Salt Co.

    334 U.S. 37 (1948)   Cited 342 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that quantity discounts are not functionally available to many small buyers
  6. Hughes v. Superior Court

    339 U.S. 460 (1950)   Cited 285 times
    In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.
  7. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
  8. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that ยง 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."
  9. F.C.C. v. Allentown Broadcasting Co.

    349 U.S. 358 (1955)   Cited 90 times
    Upholding FCC reversal of hearing examiner
  10. Rubber Workers v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 329 (1960)   Cited 22 times

    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 316. Decided April 4, 1960. Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Reported below: 269 F.2d 694. Garnet L. Patterson and Arthur J. Goldberg for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth