18 Cited authorities
National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 612 (1967) Cited 392 timesHolding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
International Salt Co. v. U.S.
332 U.S. 392 (1947) Cited 536 times 6 Legal AnalysesRejecting International Salt's claim that it had to control the supply of salt to protect its leased machines in the absence of proof that competitors could not supply salt of equal quality
Standard Oil Co. v. United States
337 U.S. 293 (1949) Cited 397 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that Clayton Act § 3 was violated whenever the exclusive dealing arrangement foreclosed a significant dollar volume of commerce
Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board
357 U.S. 93 (1958) Cited 201 timesRejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act
Glens Falls Ins. v. U.S. for Use of Newton L
390 U.S. 905 (1968) Cited 91 timesNoting the undesirability of determining the conscious objective of a union in obtaining the inclusion of a challenged provision in a collective bargaining agreement on a bare stipulation of facts which supplies no indication of purpose or intention beyond the language of the provision and the general bargaining history
Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 664 (1967) Cited 29 timesIn Houston Insulation Contractors' Ass'n v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 664, 87 S.Ct. 1278, 18 L.Ed.2d 389 (1967), the Court, relying largely on the reasoning in National Woodwork, held that a work preservation agreement between a company and a local union could be effectuated by another local of the same union.
Truck Dvrs. Un. L. No. 413, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 56 timesNos. 17662, 17663. Argued October 30, 1963. Decided April 9, 1964. Certiorari Denied November 16, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 264. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,662. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,663. Mr. Gary Green, Atty
Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
335 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 44 timesSubcontracting in cases of lack of equipment to companies employing members of same local whenever possible
Great Atlantic v. Amalgamated
410 F.2d 650 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 31 timesNo. 19328. May 14, 1969. J. Terrell Vaughan, of Armstrong, Teasdale, Kramer Vaughan, St. Louis, Mo., for appellants, Walter M. Clark and Fred Leicht, Jr., on the brief. Benjamin L. Jacobson, of Asher, Greenfield, Gubbins Segall, Chicago, Ill., for appellees, Lester Asher, Chicago, Ill., and Harry H. Craig, of Wiley, Craig, Armbruster Wilburn, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief. Before MATTHES, MEHAFFY and LAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the district court's order dismissing appellants'
A. DUIE PYLE, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD
383 F.2d 772 (3d Cir. 1967) Cited 28 timesIn A. Duie Pyle we noted that it is "undesirable to determine the conscious objective of a union in obtaining the inclusion of a challenged provision... on a bare stipulation of facts."
Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 160 Cited 7,062 times 23 Legal AnalysesFinding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB