§

Retail Clerks Union, Local 770, Etc.

138 N.L.R.B. 244 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Retail Clerks Union, Local 770, Etc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  2. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  3. Colgate Co. v. Labor Board

    338 U.S. 355 (1949)   Cited 36 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued November 17, 1949. Decided December 5, 1949. An employer and a labor organization entered into a closed-shop agreement which was valid under the National Labor Relations Act and under state law. The agreement, which the employer had entered into in good faith, was of indefinite duration and had been in effect more than four years. Pursuant to the agreement, upon the demand of the labor organization and in good

  4. Hourihan v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    201 F.2d 187 (D.C. Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times
    In Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316, 201 F.2d 187 (1952), and in Bandlow v. Rothman, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 32, 278 F.2d 866 (1960), we held that a court "has no power to order the General Counsel to issue a complaint and no power to require the Board to issue an order in a matter which is not before the Board."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 810

    299 F.2d 636 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 10 times

    No. 123, Docket 27062. Argued January 5, 1962. Decided January 12, 1962. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Herbert S. Thatcher, New York City (Henry Brickman, New York City, and David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., Harry Weinstock, New York City, of counsel), for respondent

  6. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"