Retail Clerks Union Local 324, Etc.

12 Cited authorities

Packard Co. v. Labor Board
330 U.S. 485 (1947) Cited 382 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Board determinations of unit issues involves a "large measure of informed discretion."
Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Co.
312 U.S. 287 (1941) Cited 382 times
Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"
A.F. of L. v. Swing
312 U.S. 321 (1941) Cited 299 times
In AFL v. Swing, 312 U.S. 321, 61 S.Ct. 568, 85 L.Ed. 855 (1941), the Illinois Supreme Court had enjoined picketing by a labor union on the ground that there was no dispute between the employer and his immediate employees.
Building Service Union v. Gazzam
339 U.S. 532 (1950) Cited 182 times
In Building Service E.I.U. v. Gazzam, 339 U.S. 532, 94 L.Ed. 1045, 70 S.Ct. 784 (1950), the representatives of the unions called upon Gazzam to sign a contract which would require his fifteen employees at the Enetai Inn to join their union.
62 Cases of Jam v. United States
340 U.S. 593 (1951) Cited 144 times
Finding that a product that substituted fruit in fruit jam with pectin, a gelatinized, water-based solution, was properly labeled "imitation jam"
McLeod v. Chefs, Cooks, Pastry Cooks & Assistants, Local 89, Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union
280 F.2d 760 (2d Cir. 1960) Cited 17 times
No. 336, Docket 26120. Argued March 30, 1960. Decided July 6, 1960. Winthrop A. Johns, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Jerome L. Avedon, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner-appellee. Jerome B. Lurie, New York City (Boudin, Cohn Glickstein, New York City, on the brief), for Chefs, Cooks, Pastry Cooks Assistants Union, Local 89, respondent-appellant. Benjamin D. Stein, New York
Graham v. Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n, Local No. 57
188 F. Supp. 847 (D. Mont. 1960) Cited 7 times
Civ. No. 2141. October 25, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C., Patrick H. Walker, Seattle, Wash., Walter N. Moldawer, Washington, D.C., and Melton Boyd, National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Leo C. Graybill, Jr., Great Falls, Mont., for respondent. JAMESON, District Judge. This proceeding comes before the court upon a petition filed by the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to section 10( l) of the National Labor Relations
ARKANSAS OAK FLOORING v. LOUISIANA ARK. RY
166 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1948) Cited 18 times
In Arkansas Oak Flooring Co. v. Louisiana Arkansas Ry., 166 F.2d 98 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 828, 68 S.Ct. 1338, 92 L.Ed. 1756 (1948), the Court acknowledged that the applicable transportation rate can change with the occurrence of a later event specified by the tariff.
Wentz v. United States
244 F.2d 172 (9th Cir. 1957) Cited 9 times
In Wentz, an indictment charging a telex transmission "by means of interstate and foreign wire" expressly stated its origin in Los Angeles and the path of its transmission through Dallas and San Antonio, Texas, to Mexico City, Mexico.
Lebus v. Building and Construction Trades Council
199 F. Supp. 628 (E.D. La. 1961) Cited 5 times
Civ. A. No. 11656-B. November 22, 1961. Stanley A. Mestel, Washington, D.C., Louis A. Fuselier, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Kullman Lang, Frederick A. Kullman, New Orleans, La., for Houston Contracting Co. Jackson Hess, Ralph N. Jackson, New Orleans, La., for Building and Construction Trades Council, respondent. Dodd, Hirsch, Barker Meunier, C. Paul Barker, Baton Rouge, La., Thomas J. Meunier, New Orleans, La., for Local 60, respondent. J. SKELLY WRIGHT, District Judge. This application, filed

Retail Clerks Union Local 324, Etc.

12 Cited authorities

Holding that Board determinations of unit issues involves a "large measure of informed discretion."

Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"

In AFL v. Swing, 312 U.S. 321, 61 S.Ct. 568, 85 L.Ed. 855 (1941), the Illinois Supreme Court had enjoined picketing by a labor union on the ground that there was no dispute between the employer and his immediate employees.

In Building Service E.I.U. v. Gazzam, 339 U.S. 532, 94 L.Ed. 1045, 70 S.Ct. 784 (1950), the representatives of the unions called upon Gazzam to sign a contract which would require his fifteen employees at the Enetai Inn to join their union.

Finding that a product that substituted fruit in fruit jam with pectin, a gelatinized, water-based solution, was properly labeled "imitation jam"

In Arkansas Oak Flooring Co. v. Louisiana Arkansas Ry., 166 F.2d 98 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 828, 68 S.Ct. 1338, 92 L.Ed. 1756 (1948), the Court acknowledged that the applicable transportation rate can change with the occurrence of a later event specified by the tariff.

In Wentz, an indictment charging a telex transmission "by means of interstate and foreign wire" expressly stated its origin in Los Angeles and the path of its transmission through Dallas and San Antonio, Texas, to Mexico City, Mexico.