Retail Clerks Union Local 1557

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
  2. N.L.R.B. v. United Indus. Wkrs

    422 F.2d 59 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 2 times

    No. 27480. February 13, 1970. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Joseph C. Thackery, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for petitioner. Joel Field, Schulman, Abarbanel Kroner, Howard Schulman, Jack L. Kroner, New York City, for respondent. Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and DYER, Circuit Judges. DYER, Circuit Judge: The circumstances of this

  3. Penello v. Retail Store Employees Local Union No. 692

    188 F. Supp. 192 (D. Md. 1960)   Cited 7 times

    Civ. No. 12472. September 23, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Charles B. Slaughter, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., and Theodore K. High, Atty., NLRB, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Melvin A. Steinberg, Baltimore, Md., and Joseph E. Finley, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. THOMSEN, Chief Judge. Facts This proceeding is before the court on a petition of the Regional Director of the Fifth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, on behalf of the Board, pursuant to sec. 10( l) of the

  4. Penello v. Retail Store Employees Local Union No. 692

    287 F.2d 509 (4th Cir. 1961)   Cited 5 times

    No. 8243. Argued January 5, 1961. Decided March 3, 1961. Joseph E. Finley, Cleveland, Ohio (Rudd, Ober, Finley Miller, Cleveland, Ohio and Melvin A. Steinberg, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant. Winthrop A. Johns, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Charles B. Slaughter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellee. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit