§

Retail Clerks, Locals 698 and 298

160 N.L.R.B. 709 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Retail Clerks, Locals 698 and 298

4 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Local 3, I.B.E.W., Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B

    845 F.2d 1177 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that FOIA's exemption 5 is "narrowly construed with all doubts resolved in favor of disclosure"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Cadillac Wire Corp.

    290 F.2d 261 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 4 times

    No. 309, Docket 26688. Argued April 12, 1961. Decided May 10, 1961. Glen M. Bendixsen, Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Sol E. King, New York City, for the Cadillac Corporation. Harry Weinstock, Henry Brickman, New York City, Weinstock Tauber, New York City, of counsel, for the Union. Before FRIENDLY, HAND and

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mechanics Educational Society of America

    222 F.2d 429 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 2 times

    No. 12339. April 27, 1955. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Maurice Alexandre, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jack G. Day, Cleveland, Ohio (James P. Hannan, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for respondents. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. On this petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, the issue presented is whether the board properly held that