§

Retail Clerks Int'l Association, Local 57, AFL-CIO

138 N.L.R.B. 498 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Retail Clerks Int'l Association, Local 57, AFL-CIO

4 Cited authorities

  1. Ewing v. Mytinger Casselberry

    339 U.S. 594 (1950)   Cited 375 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 334, as amended, which permitted seizures of misbranded articles without a hearing, did not violate due process principles, given the risk presented to public health by such misbranded articles

  2. Inland Empire Council v. Millis

    325 U.S. 697 (1945)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Inland Empire, a union that had lost a representation election brought suit in district court challenging the Board's proceedings on the ground that there had not been the "appropriate hearing" mandated by Section 9(c) of the NLRA. It argued that the failure to provide such a hearing violated the union's statutory and due process rights.

  3. Graham v. Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n, Local No. 57

    188 F. Supp. 847 (D. Mont. 1960)   Cited 7 times

    Civ. No. 2141. October 25, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C., Patrick H. Walker, Seattle, Wash., Walter N. Moldawer, Washington, D.C., and Melton Boyd, National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Leo C. Graybill, Jr., Great Falls, Mont., for respondent. JAMESON, District Judge. This proceeding comes before the court upon a petition filed by the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to section 10( l) of the National Labor Relations

  4. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,103 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"