5 Cited authorities
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 timesHolding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl
315 U.S. 769 (1942) Cited 236 timesReversing an injunction against peaceful picketing
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 50
245 F.2d 542 (2d Cir. 1957) Cited 18 timesNo. 241, Docket 24293. Argued February 15, 1957. Decided May 23, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Norton J. Come, Franklin C. Milliken, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Howard N. Meyer, O'Dwyer Bernstien, New York City, for respondent. Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order directing the
N.L.R.B. v. Local 239
289 F.2d 41 (2d Cir. 1961) Cited 10 timesNo. 271, Docket 26600. Argued February 24, 1961. Decided April 17, 1961. James C. Paras, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles R. Katz, Katz Wolchok, New York City, for respondent. Before HINCKS and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and BRENNAN, District Judge. Sitting by designation