§

Respond First Aid/Complete First Aid System/Dot Health Care Products

299 N.L.R.B. 167 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Respond First Aid/Complete First Aid System/Dot Health Care Products

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 655 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Turnbull Cone Baking Co. v. N.L.R.B

    778 F.2d 292 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 51 times
    In Turnbull Cone, we unequivocally established that "[c]ircumstantial evidence alone may be sufficient" to prove a section 8(a)(3) transgression.

  4. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  5. Lawson Co. v. N.L.R.B

    753 F.2d 471 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 83-5677, 83-5808. Argued November 28, 1984. Decided January 21, 1985. Michael T. McMenamin (argued), William Gorenc, Jr., Walter, Haverfield, Buescher Chockley, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Marjorie Gofreed, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MARTIN, JONES and CONTIE, Circuit Judges. BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. The Lawson Company petitions this court to review and set aside an order of the

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    488 F.2d 114 (8th Cir. 1973)   Cited 14 times

    No. 73-1246. Submitted October 16, 1973. Decided December 4, 1973. William H. Bruckner, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. Marjory Gofreed, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Before LAY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EISELE, District Judge. G. Thomas Eisele, District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation. LAY, Circuit Judge. The sole issue presented is whether there exists substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's finding that Wal-Mart