Research Foundation of State University of New York

11 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,552 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"
  2. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich

    510 U.S. 200 (1994)   Cited 423 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that petitioner's constitutional claims could first be brought before the agency
  3. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 553 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA
  4. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  5. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 293 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  6. Lunney, an Infant v. Prodigy Services Co.

    529 U.S. 1098 (2000)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 99-1430. May 1, 2000, OCTOBER TERM, 1999. Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 N. Y. 2d 242, 723 N. E. 2d 539.

  7. Central Hardware Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    407 U.S. 539 (1972)   Cited 142 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that retail store parking lot was not "open to the public" and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Calkins

    187 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 52 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest
  9. Salmon Run Shopping Center LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    534 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Observing that reversal based on factual findings is warranted only if "no rational trier of fact could reach the conclusion drawn by the Board"
  10. O'Neil's Markets v. United Food

    95 F.3d 733 (8th Cir. 1996)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer cannot exclude handbillers unless they interfere with the right of employer, employees and customers to use the easement property