Resco Products, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
  3. AT&T v. N.L.R.B

    67 F.3d 446 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 32 times

    Nos. 1796, 1938, 1939, Docket Nos. 94-4232, 95-4018, 95-4020. Argued June 12, 1995. Decided: September 29, 1995. Order Clarifying Decision on Rehearing September 29, 1995. Francis X. Dee, Newark, NJ (Stephen F. Payerle, Carpenter, Bennett Morrissey; Anna R. O'Connor, Berkeley Heights, NJ; and Thomas Stomski, Piscataway, NJ, of counsel), for Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. David Habenstreit, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Acting Associate

  4. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    765 F.2d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer is prohibited "from altering contractual terms concerning mandatory subjects of bargaining during the life of a collective bargaining agreement without the consent of the union"
  5. Local 32B-32J Service Emp. Intern. v. N.L.R.B

    982 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 24, 81, Dockets 92-4039, 92-4055. Argued September 1, 1992. Decided January 7, 1993. Ira A. Sturm, New York City (Manning, Raab, Dealy Sturm, of counsel), for Local 32B-32J, Service Employees Intern. Union, AFL-CIO. Martin Gringer, Garden City, N Y (Franklin Gringer, P.C., of counsel), for Field Bridge Associates and Rachel Bridge Corp. Michael J. Gan, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel), for N.L.R.B. Petition for review

  6. Borden, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    19 F.3d 502 (10th Cir. 1994)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that there are no retroactivity concerns when an agency's ruling does not "overrule any controlling precedent upon which [petitioner] relied to its detriment"
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Swift Adhesives

    110 F.3d 632 (8th Cir. 1997)

    No. 96-2904 Submitted February 14, 1997 Filed April 14, 1997 Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the petitioner was Jeffrey S. Wheeler of the National Labor Relations Board in Washington, D.C. Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda Sher, Frederick L. Feinstein and Peter Winkler appeared on the brief. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the respondent was Michael J. Bobroff of St. Louis, Missouri. Petition for Review of the Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BOWMAN