§
Rescar, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Advanced Business Forms Corp.

    474 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 24 times
    Timing and abruptness of discharge are persuasive evidence of motivation

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc.

    659 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc., 659 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981), we held that looking to the substance of an agreement is permissible when it "supports an inference of intent to frustrate agreement where... the entire spectrum of proposals put forward by a party is so consistently and predictably unpalatable to the other party that the proposer should know agreement is impossible."

  7. Atlas Metal Parts Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    660 F.2d 304 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times
    Denying enforcement to Board order requiring the provision of subcontracting information because insufficient showing of relevance