§

Reno Hilton Resorts

326 N.L.R.B. 1421 (N.L.R.B. 1998)
Reno Hilton Resorts

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Automatic Sprinkler v. National Lab. Relations

    120 F.3d 612 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 95-6599; 96-5159. Argued: December 5, 1996. Decided and Filed: July 29, 1997. Donald F. Woodcock (argued and briefed), Todd F. Palmer (briefed), Calfee, Halter Griswold, Cleveland, OH, for Petitioners/Cross-Respondents. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Peter Winkler (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner