RELCO LOCOMOTIVES, INC.

22 Cited authorities

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,674 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Central Hardware Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
407 U.S. 539 (1972) Cited 142 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding that retail store parking lot was not "open to the public" and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot
Grandison v. U.S.
495 U.S. 934 (1990) Cited 53 times
No. 89-6673. May 14, 1990. C.A. 4TH Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 885 F.2d 143.
Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B
335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 24 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors
Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 17 times 2 Legal Analyses
Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor Relations
253 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 20 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity
Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B
400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005) Cited 16 times
Nos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel
S F Market St. Healthcare LLC v. N.L.R.B
570 F.3d 354 (D.C. Cir. 2009) Cited 10 times
No. 07-1439, 07-1502. Argued November 17, 2008. Decided June 30, 2009. John H. Douglas argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Jill A. Griffin, Supervisory Attorney. Meredith L. Jason and Jason Walta, Attorneys, entered appearances. Before:
N.L.R.B. v. Dorothy Shamrock Coal Co.
833 F.2d 1263 (7th Cir. 1987) Cited 34 times
Stating that "comments demonstrate a `manifest hostility' toward union activity . . . are relevant in determining the Company's motive for its conduct"

RELCO LOCOMOTIVES, INC.

22 Cited authorities

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Finding that retail store parking lot was not "open to the public" and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot

Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity

Stating that "comments demonstrate a `manifest hostility' toward union activity . . . are relevant in determining the Company's motive for its conduct"