Regina Pratt, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

10 Cited authorities

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,707 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Pullman-Standard v. Swint
456 U.S. 273 (1982) Cited 1,630 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"
Dothard v. Rawlinson
433 U.S. 321 (1977) Cited 793 times
Holding impermissible minimum statutory height and weight requirements for correctional counselors
Auto. Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
499 U.S. 187 (1991) Cited 360 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[w]hether an employment practice involves disparate treatment through explicit facial discrimination does not depend on why the employer discriminates but rather on the explicit terms of the discrimination"
Healey v. Southwood Psychiatric Hosp
78 F.3d 128 (3d Cir. 1996) Cited 61 times
Finding error in District Court's application of McDonnell Douglas to case involving facially discriminatory policy
Robino v. Iranon
145 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 1998) Cited 32 times
Holding that, where Hawaii prison administrators appointed a task force to review prison policies, their “professional judgment is entitled to deference”
Jennings v. N.Y. State Office of Mental Health
786 F. Supp. 376 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) Cited 26 times
In Jennings, 786 F. Supp. 376, the defendant New York State Office of Mental Health ("OMH"), established, on a motion for summary judgment, that sex was a valid BFOQ for the position of treatment assistant at one of its hospitals.
Jennings v. New York State Office of Mental Health
977 F.2d 731 (2d Cir. 1992) Cited 18 times
No. 31, Docket 92-7386. Argued October 8, 1992. Decided October 16, 1992. Brian O'Donnell, Albany, N.Y. (Rowley, Forrest, O'Donnell Hite, P.C., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. Marilyn T. Trautfield, Asst. Atty. Gen. of the State of N.Y. (Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. and Nancy Miller Lerner, of counsel), for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Before: VAN GRAAFEILAND, PRATT, and WALKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs
Pime v. Loyola Univ. of Chi.
803 F.2d 351 (7th Cir. 1986) Cited 22 times
Holding that membership in the Jesuit order was a BFOQ for filling tenure-track professorships because maintaining an adequate Jesuit presence was important to the successful operation of a Jesuit-affiliated university
Fesel v. Masonic Home of Del., Inc.
447 F. Supp. 1346 (D. Del. 1978) Cited 29 times
Holding "general injunctive relief will not be granted where there will be no benefit to the plaintiff"

Regina Pratt, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

10 Cited authorities

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

Holding impermissible minimum statutory height and weight requirements for correctional counselors

Holding that "[w]hether an employment practice involves disparate treatment through explicit facial discrimination does not depend on why the employer discriminates but rather on the explicit terms of the discrimination"

Finding error in District Court's application of McDonnell Douglas to case involving facially discriminatory policy

Holding that, where Hawaii prison administrators appointed a task force to review prison policies, their “professional judgment is entitled to deference”

In Jennings, 786 F. Supp. 376, the defendant New York State Office of Mental Health ("OMH"), established, on a motion for summary judgment, that sex was a valid BFOQ for the position of treatment assistant at one of its hospitals.

Holding that membership in the Jesuit order was a BFOQ for filling tenure-track professorships because maintaining an adequate Jesuit presence was important to the successful operation of a Jesuit-affiliated university

Holding "general injunctive relief will not be granted where there will be no benefit to the plaintiff"