§

Regents of the University of Minnesota

IPR2017-01213 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 18, 2020)
Regents of the University of Minnesota

6 Cited authorities

  1. Taylor v. Sturgell

    553 U.S. 880 (2008)   Cited 3,268 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that adequate representation requires that "[t]he interests of the nonparty and her representative are aligned" and "the party understood herself to be acting in a representative capacity."

  2. Intel Corp. v. U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n

    946 F.2d 821 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 315 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an indemnification agreement, in other cases, has alone been enough to find privity"

  3. Gonzalez v. Banco Cent. Corp.

    27 F.3d 751 (1st Cir. 1994)   Cited 172 times
    Holding that for claim preclusion to apply, a litigant first must have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate her claim

  4. Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp.

    887 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2018)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that privity and real party in interest under § 315(b) should be examined "consistent with general legal principles," citing Taylor

  5. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 547 times   889 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

  6. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 22 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A