§

Regency House of Wallingford

347 N.L.R.B. 173 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Regency House of Wallingford

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Williams Enterprises, Inc.

    50 F.3d 1280 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Upholding finding of causation where four months passed between company's anti-union statements and decertification petition

  6. JHP & Associates, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    360 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2004)   Cited 10 times

    No. 03-2303. Submitted: November 17, 2003. Filed: March 16, 2004. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence P. Kaplan, argued, St. Louis, MO (Joshua M. Avigad, St. Louis, MO, on the brief), for appellant. Jeffrey L. Horowitz, argued, of the NLRB of Washington, D.C. (Charles Donnelly of the NLRB, Washington, D.C. appeared on the brief), for appellee. James I. Singer, argued, St. Louis, MO, intervenor, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No

  7. Lotus Suites, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    32 F.3d 588 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 7 times
    Denying enforcement where the charge contained only a "boilerplate allegation that the Employer violated § 8 and [was] utterly lacking in factual specificity"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. K K Gourmet Meats, Inc.

    640 F.2d 460 (3d Cir. 1981)   Cited 16 times
    In K K Gourmet Meats, the ALJ had characterized the violations of the Act as "minimal", 640 F.2d at 468; in this case the ALJ described the promotions and wage increases as "serious unfair labor practices."

  9. Hartsell Mills Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.2d 291 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 41 times

    No. 4592. April 10, 1940. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Hartsell Mills Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition denied; order modified and enforced. Edwin A. Lucas, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Benjamin W. Parham and Parham Taylor, all of Oxford, N.C., and Drinker, Biddle Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Bertram Edises, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C., (Charles

  10. Lion Oil Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

    245 F.2d 376 (8th Cir. 1957)   Cited 7 times

    No. 15158. June 5, 1957. Jeff Davis, El Dorado, Ark. (B.L. Allen and H.D. Dickens, El Dorado, Ark., were with him on the brief), for petitioners. Duane Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. VOGEL, Circuit Judge. When this case