Regency Grande Nursing and Rehaibilitation Center

4 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Regency Grand

    265 F. App'x 74 (3d Cir. 2008)   Cited 2 times

    No. 06-5013. Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Friday, January 3,2008. Filed: February 20, 2008. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Board Case No. 22-CA-26231). David Seid, Robert J. Englehart, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Morris Tuchman, New York, NY, for Respondent. Before: FUENTES, JORDAN, Circuit Judges, and DUBOIS, District Judge. The Honorable Jan E. DuBois, Senior United States District Judge for the

  3. GSX Corp. of Missouri v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    918 F.2d 1351 (8th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Reviewing board's findings more critically where board's findings are contrary to ALJ's
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hicks Oils & Hicksgas, Inc.

    942 F.2d 1140 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times

    No. 89-2795. Argued January 14, 1991. Decided September 4, 1991. Barbara A. Atkin, Judith P. Flower, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, William A. Baudler (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph H. Solien, N.L.R.B., Region 14, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Gary A. Wincek (argued), William L. Becker, Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, Ill., Nancy M. Watkins, Wilburn, Suggs Watkins, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent