Reebie Storage & Moving Co.

8 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.
360 U.S. 301 (1959) Cited 106 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.
318 U.S. 9 (1943) Cited 108 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."
Davis Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
2 F.3d 1162 (D.C. Cir. 1993) Cited 30 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming bargaining order where company's "large number of unfair labor practices, . . . committed by some of the top officials in the company, and . . . directed at numerous employees . . . instilled a strong fear of union representation in the employees."
Richmond Recording Corp. v. N.L.R.B
836 F.2d 289 (7th Cir. 1987) Cited 30 times
Asserting that an impasse does not exist unless "[b]oth parties ... believe that they are at the end of their rope"
Gulf States Mfg. Inc. v. N.L.R.B
704 F.2d 1390 (5th Cir. 1983) Cited 26 times
Holding that an employer preserved an issue by ambiguously referencing the issue in a motion for reconsideration
N.L.R.B. v. Central Power Light Company
425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970) Cited 30 times 1 Legal Analyses
In NLRB v. Central Pwr. Light Co., 425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970), the original charge alleged a discriminatory discharge of an employee and stated the company had violated section 7 rights "by other acts and conduct."
Property Resources Corp. v. N.L.R.B
863 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1988) Cited 8 times
Stating that the Board "can infer from falsity of employer's stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful" (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. NLRB , 362 F.2d 466, 470 (9th Cir. 1966) )

Reebie Storage & Moving Co.

8 Cited authorities

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

Affirming bargaining order where company's "large number of unfair labor practices, . . . committed by some of the top officials in the company, and . . . directed at numerous employees . . . instilled a strong fear of union representation in the employees."

Asserting that an impasse does not exist unless "[b]oth parties ... believe that they are at the end of their rope"

Holding that an employer preserved an issue by ambiguously referencing the issue in a motion for reconsideration

In NLRB v. Central Pwr. Light Co., 425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970), the original charge alleged a discriminatory discharge of an employee and stated the company had violated section 7 rights "by other acts and conduct."

Stating that the Board "can infer from falsity of employer's stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful" (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. NLRB , 362 F.2d 466, 470 (9th Cir. 1966) )