Red Top Cab & Baggage Co.,

26 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Teamsters Union v. Oliver
358 U.S. 283 (1959) Cited 166 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Teamsters v. Oliver, 358 U.S. 283 (1959), we held that a state antitrust law could not be used to challenge an employer-union agreement. Justice White's opinion in Jewel Tea explains, however, that Oliver held only that "[a]s the agreement did not embody a `"remote and indirect approach to the subject of wages'... but a direct frontal attack upon a problem thought to threaten the maintenance of the basic wage structure established by the collective bargaining contract,' [358 U.S.], at 294, the paramount federal policy of encouraging collective bargaining proscribed application of the state law.
Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl
315 U.S. 769 (1942) Cited 236 times
Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing
Labor Board v. Electrical Workers
346 U.S. 464 (1953) Cited 125 times 41 Legal Analyses
Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
Drivers' Union v. Lake Valley Co.
311 U.S. 91 (1940) Cited 161 times
Holding that labor disputes under the NLGA included secondary strikes
Mitchell v. Tribune Company
342 U.S. 919 (1952) Cited 90 times
Employing the "target area" approach
Meat Drivers v. United States
371 U.S. 94 (1962) Cited 43 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming injunction against grease peddlers because, as in Hinton, they "were sellers of commodities, who became `members' of the union only for the purpose of bringing upon power to bear in the successful enforcement of the illegal combination in restraint of the traffic in yellow grease"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co.
130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942) Cited 69 times 1 Legal Analyses
In NLRB v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., 130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942), Judge Learned Hand stated his view of the type of activity protected by section 7.
N.L.R.B. v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc.
315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963) Cited 25 times
In NLRB v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., 315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963), the court listed seventeen factors which supported the Board's conclusion of employee status.

Red Top Cab & Baggage Co.,

26 Cited authorities

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing

Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

Holding that labor disputes under the NLGA included secondary strikes

Employing the "target area" approach

Affirming injunction against grease peddlers because, as in Hinton, they "were sellers of commodities, who became `members' of the union only for the purpose of bringing upon power to bear in the successful enforcement of the illegal combination in restraint of the traffic in yellow grease"

In NLRB v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., 130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942), Judge Learned Hand stated his view of the type of activity protected by section 7.

In NLRB v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., 315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963), the court listed seventeen factors which supported the Board's conclusion of employee status.