Red BullGmbH

In re Nett Designs, Inc.
236 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2001) Cited 28 times
Finding that prior registrations of marks including the term ULTIMATE "do not conclusively rebut the Board's finding that ULTIMATE is descriptive in the context of this mark"
In re Boulevard Entertainment, Inc.
334 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2003) Cited 10 times 2 Legal Analyses
Affirming refusal to register JACK–OFF marks
In re Mavety Media Group Ltd.
33 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 1994) Cited 13 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that PTO failed to prove that term was scandalous and thus unregistrable; PTO relied on dictionary definition of disputed term, but dictionary provided alternative definitions; proof failed because of "the absence of evidence as to which of these definitions the substantial composite [of consumers] would choose"
University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co.
703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1983) Cited 20 times 2 Legal Analyses
In University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 703 F.2d 1372, 1376, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the court added that section 2(a) embraces concepts of the right to privacy which may be violated even in the absence of likelihood of confusion.
In re Riverbank Canning Co.
95 F.2d 327 (C.C.P.A. 1938) Cited 11 times 3 Legal Analyses
Affirming refusal to register MADONNA mark for wine