§

Red Barn System, Inc.

224 N.L.R.B. 1586 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Red Barn System, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Surprenant Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 60 times
    In Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965) this Court approved as non-threatening, language of the employer which was much stronger than that used in the present case.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. River Togs, Inc.

    382 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 48 times
    In NLRB v. River Togs, Inc. (2d Cir. July 27, 1967) 382 F.2d 198, however, we recognized some of the limitations of the authorization card procedure, calling for scrutiny of the manner of execution of the cards.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WKRG-TV, Inc.

    470 F.2d 1302 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 33 times
    Enforcing Gissel Order where employer interrogated employees, promised benefits if the union lost, prohibited solicitation, and otherwise interfered with unionization efforts

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Louisiana Manufacturing Company

    374 F.2d 696 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 32 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Louisiana Manufacturing Company, 374 F.2d 696, 701-703 (8th Cir. 1967), this court was faced with the question of whether similar statements could be construed as being threats of economic reprisal.

  6. Hughes Hatcher, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    393 F.2d 557 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    Nos. 17412, 17517. April 17, 1968. William M. Saxton, Detroit, Mich., Robert J. Battista, Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust Kennedy, Detroit, Mich., Lee B. Brody, Smith, Hirsch Brody, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for petitioner Hughes Hatcher. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, Sheldon Klimist, Detroit, Mich., Bernard J. Firestone, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for petitioner Central States Joint Board etc. Theodore Sachs, Detroit, Mich., Rothe, Martson Mazey, Sachs O'Connell, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for intervenor

  7. Wausau Steel Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    377 F.2d 369 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 21 times

    No. 15840. April 11, 1967. Richard P. Tinkham, of Smith, Puchner, Tinkham Smith, Wausau, Wis., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and SCHNACKENBERG and KILEY, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. The Wausau Steel Corporation

  8. Wilkinson Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    456 F.2d 298 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 71-1021, 71-1030. March 1, 1972. Charles E. Sykes, Lincoln, Neb., for petitioner Wilkinson Mfg. Co. William A. Jolley, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner United Steelworkers. Howard C. Hay, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from Petitions for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, BRIGHT and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges. BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. This labor-management controversy stems from the efforts of United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Armstrong Circuit, Inc.

    462 F.2d 355 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 10 times
    In NLRB v. Armstrong Circuit, Inc., 462 F.2d 355, 357 (6th Cir. 1972), we reiterated that to determine whether employer interrogation of employees is unlawful, it must be determined "whether it may reasonably be said that the interrogation `tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act.'"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Miller

    341 F.2d 870 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 274, 306, Dockets 29186, 29296. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided March 1, 1965. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City (Michael P. Graff, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board