Rea Construction Co.
3 Cited authorities
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Shoreline Enterprises of Am., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
262 F.2d 933 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 46 timesIn Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. NLRB, 262 F.2d 933 (5 Cir. 1959), the court recognized that a Board agent is present not only to make sure eligible voters vote but also to make sure that an employee who thinks he is eligible may cast a challenged ballot.
Summit Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
260 F.2d 894 (3d Cir. 1958) Cited 12 timesNo. 12573. Argued September 16, 1958. Decided October 28, 1958. Horace E. Smith, York, Pa. (Thomas H. Reed, York, Pa., Charles W. Wolf, Gettysburg, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas Ryan, Washington, D.C., and Falls Church, Va. (Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY