§

Ray N. Capil, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific Area), Agency.

01983461 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 17, 2001)
Ray N. Capil, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific Area), Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.

    527 U.S. 471 (1999)   Cited 2,896 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that " person whose physical or mental impairment is corrected by medication or other measures does not have an impairment that presently 'substantially limits' a major life activity."

  2. Bragdon v. Abbott

    524 U.S. 624 (1998)   Cited 1,642 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that DOJ's administrative guidance on ADA compliance is entitled to deference

  3. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

    527 U.S. 516 (1999)   Cited 502 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "determination of [a person's] disability is made with reference to the mitigating measures he employs."