7 Cited authorities
C.S. Smith Met. Market Co. v. Lyons
16 Cal.2d 389 (Cal. 1940) Cited 47 timesIn C.S. Smith Met. Market Co. v. Lyons, 16 Cal.2d 389 [ 106 P.2d 414], where the picketing caused other firms and their employees to refrain from selling or delivering merchandise to the plaintiffs, the Cartwright Act was mentioned and it was pointed out that that act interfered to some extent with free competition in business; that interference with business through picketing is also sanctioned by law; and that the test to be applied in such a case is whether the workmen are demanding something which is reasonably related to employment and collective bargaining.
N.L.R.B. v. Hyde
339 F.2d 568 (9th Cir. 1965) Cited 13 timesNo. 19350. December 15, 1964. Rehearing Denied February 4, 1965. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, George B. Driesen, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gunther F. Krause, Portland, Willard K. Carey, La Grande, Fredric R. Merrill, Krause, Lindsay Nahstoll, Portland, Or., for respondent. Before POPE, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: This case is before
O'Shea v. Tile Layers Union
155 Cal.App.2d 373 (Cal. Ct. App. 1957) Cited 10 timesDocket No. 17386. November 21, 1957. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County granting a preliminary injunction. Charles Wade Snook, Judge. Modified and affirmed. Action for injunction and for damages under the Cartwright Act. Preliminary injunction modified and affirmed. P.H. McCarthy, Jr., F. Nason O'Hara and Herbert S. Johnson for Appellants. Wallace B. Colthurst and Orlando J. Bowman for Respondents. DRAPER, J. This is an action for injunction and damages under the Cartwright
L. A. Pie Bakers Association v. Bakery Drivers
122 Cal.App.2d 237 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953) Cited 9 timesIn L.A. Pie Bakers, a demurrer based on section 16703 was affirmed where the complaint alleged facts showing that the defendant union (1) had never negotiated a collective bargaining agreement on behalf of the independent contractors it sought to represent, and (2) was attempting to obtain agreement to its demands by "economic pressure."
United States v. Carrozzo
37 F. Supp. 191 (N.D. Ill. 1941) Cited 21 timesNo. 32271. February 4, 1941. Judgment Affirmed April 7, 1941. See 61 S.Ct. 839, 85 L.Ed. ___. Thurman Arnold, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Albert Woll, U.S. Atty., and Leo F. Tierney and Daniel B. Britt, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., all of Chicago, Ill., Richard P. Shanahan and Thomas H. Daly, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., both of Washington, D.C., and David R. Mason, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., of Chicago, Ill., for the United States. Joseph R. Roach and Samuel H. Shapiro, both of Chicago, Ill., for defendants
Schweizer v. Local Joint Executive Board
121 Cal.App.2d 45 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953) Cited 6 timesDocket No. 4600. November 3, 1953. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. John A. Hewicker, Judge. Reversed. Todd Todd, Vincent Whelan, Thomas Whelan and Walter Wencke, Stevenson Richmond for Appellants. Gray, Cary, Ames Frye, James W. Archer and Ward W. Wardell, Jr., for Respondents. BARNARD, P.J. This is an action to restrain the defendants from interfering with plaintiffs' business by picketing, or by preventing the purchase and delivery of supplies, and for damages
United States v. Hutcheson
32 F. Supp. 600 (E.D. Mo. 1940) Cited 3 timesNo. 21231. March 29, 1940. William L. Hutcheson, George Casper Ottens, John A. Callahan, and Joseph August Klein were indicted for conspiracy to restrain interstate commerce. On separate demurrers to the indictment. Demurrers sustained. Thurman Arnold, Roscoe T. Steffen, William M. Marvel, James McI. Henderson, Paul V. Ford, and Wilber Stammler, all of Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Joseph O. Carson, II, and Joseph O. Carson, Sr., both of Indianapolis, Ind., Charles H. Tuttle and Thomas E. Kerwin