Rapid Armored Truck Corp.

8 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
388 U.S. 26 (1967) Cited 323 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 234 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Allied Industrial Workers, AFL-CIO Local Union No. 289 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
476 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1973) Cited 48 times
Noting that "naked information" regarding the filing of a decertification petition without information regarding the number of signatories is insufficient to create good faith doubt of union majority status, even with additional evidence present
General Ser. Emp. U. Local No. 73 v. N.L.R.B
578 F.2d 361 (D.C. Cir. 1978) Cited 19 times
Discussing threats, but not statutes of limitations
Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807 v. N.L.R.B
755 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1985) Cited 11 times 1 Legal Analyses
Noting that second clause of section 9(b) "denies" union representing non-guards "the right to be certified as a representative of a unit of guards"
N.L.R.B. v. Comfort, Inc.
365 F.2d 867 (8th Cir. 1966) Cited 27 times
No. 18210. September 13, 1966. Rehearing Denied October 11, 1966. Richard S. Rodin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington D.C., were with him on the brief. Bailey C. Webber, Ottumwa, Iowa, for respondent. Before VOGEL, Chief Judge, and MATTHES and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges. MATTHES
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.
213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954) Cited 40 times
In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.

Rapid Armored Truck Corp.

8 Cited authorities

Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Noting that "naked information" regarding the filing of a decertification petition without information regarding the number of signatories is insufficient to create good faith doubt of union majority status, even with additional evidence present

Discussing threats, but not statutes of limitations

Noting that second clause of section 9(b) "denies" union representing non-guards "the right to be certified as a representative of a unit of guards"

In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.