§

Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.

IPR2020-00122 (P.T.A.B. May. 15, 2020)
Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee

    136 S. Ct. 2131 (2016)   Cited 268 times   164 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board's interpretation of the petition to have implicitly presented a challenge was unreviewable

  2. Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Techs.

    140 S. Ct. 1367 (2020)   Cited 35 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding that departure in language shows a departure in meaning

  3. Trover Grp., Inc. v. Dedicated Micros U.S.

    Case No. 2:13-CV-1047-WCB (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2015)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the concern of loss of documentary and testimonial evidence during a continued stay "is entitled to some weight, although the Court notes that the concern is general in nature, rather than specific..."

  4. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 538 times   883 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

  5. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 371 times   627 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  6. Section 316 - Conduct of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 316   Cited 279 times   307 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "the petitioner shall have the burden of proving a proposition of unpatentability"

  7. Section 325 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 325   Cited 43 times   247 Legal Analyses

    (a) INFRINGER'S CIVIL ACTION.- (1) POST-GRANT REVIEW BARRED BY CIVIL ACTION.-A post-grant review may not be instituted under this chapter if, before the date on which the petition for such a review is filed, the petitioner or real party in interest filed a civil action challenging the validity of a claim of the patent. (2) STAY OF CIVIL ACTION.-If the petitioner or real party in interest files a civil action challenging the validity of a claim of the patent on or after the date on which the petitioner

  8. Section 42.100 - Procedure; pendency

    37 C.F.R. § 42.100   Cited 189 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the PTAB gives " claim . . . its broadest reasonable construction in light of the specification of the patent in which it appears"