Ramey Supermarkets, Don Newton'S Supermarket, Inc

25 Cited authorities

San Diego Unions v. Garmon
359 U.S. 236 (1959) Cited 2,558 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
447 U.S. 74 (1980) Cited 735 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"
Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters
436 U.S. 180 (1978) Cited 554 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA
Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
424 U.S. 507 (1976) Cited 543 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"
U.S. v. Amer. Trucking Ass'ns
310 U.S. 534 (1940) Cited 1,677 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"
Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner
407 U.S. 551 (1972) Cited 466 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a private shopping center did not violate the First Amendment by prohibiting the distribution of handbills on its property
Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
441 U.S. 488 (1979) Cited 288 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer
Food Employees v. Logan Plaza
391 U.S. 308 (1968) Cited 379 times
Extending Marsh to cover a private shopping center to the extent that it sought to restrict speech about its businesses
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
United States v. Causby
328 U.S. 256 (1946) Cited 693 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding taking occurred where Army occupied airspace above plaintiff's land for limited periods of takeoff and landing

Ramey Supermarkets, Don Newton'S Supermarket, Inc

25 Cited authorities

Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"

Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"

Holding that a private shopping center did not violate the First Amendment by prohibiting the distribution of handbills on its property

Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer

Extending Marsh to cover a private shopping center to the extent that it sought to restrict speech about its businesses

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding taking occurred where Army occupied airspace above plaintiff's land for limited periods of takeoff and landing