§

Ralston Purina Co.

204 N.L.R.B. 366 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Ralston Purina Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  2. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  4. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  5. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  6. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  7. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  8. Labor Board v. Pool Mfg. Co.

    339 U.S. 577 (1950)   Cited 31 times
    In Pool, the Board and the employer had been negotiating for at least part of those two and a half years, and the court found that "exhaustion of negotiation techniques before a decree is requested may consume many months after the Board's order and before such techniques fail."

  9. Inland Trucking Co. v. N.L.R.B

    440 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 7 times
    In Inland Trucking Co. v. NLRB, 440 F.2d 562, 565 (7th Cir. 1971), the Seventh Circuit held that a bargaining "lockout... accompanied by continued operation with [temporary] replacement labor, is per se, an interference with protected employee rights, and, accordingly, per se, an unfair labor practice."

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Chambers Manufacturing Corporation

    278 F.2d 715 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 10 times

    No. 18127. May 31, 1960. Jerome L. Avedon, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George P. Ryan, Alan T. Nolan, Indianapolis, Ind., Frederick A. Kullman, New Orleans, La., Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., and Ross, McCord, Ice Miller, Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel, for respondent