Ralphs Grocery Company

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Garment Workers v. Quality Mfg. Co.

    420 U.S. 276 (1975)   Cited 68 times
    Holding that because the employer “failed to file a petition for reconsideration as permitted by Board Rules and Regulations,” the employer could not assert its objection on appeal
  4. Christian v. U.S.

    541 U.S. 972 (2004)   Cited 2 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. No. 03-938. April 5, 2004. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 337 F. 3d 1338.

  5. Spurlino Materials, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    645 F.3d 870 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 10 times
    Establishing new employee evaluation system was mandatory subject of bargaining
  6. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    338 F.3d 267 (4th Cir. 2003)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that "an employee . . . can lose protections if his conduct is so egregious as to take it outside the protection of the Act, or of such a character as to render the employee unfit for further service"
  7. Mobil Exploration Prod. U.S. v. N.L.R.B

    200 F.3d 230 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 11 times
    Defining "concerted activity"
  8. Garcia v. N.L.R.B

    785 F.2d 807 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that for the deferral policy to apply, the parties must have agreed to be bound by the arbitration
  9. Columbia Portland Cement Co. v. N.L.R.B

    915 F.2d 253 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 7 times
    Balancing these competing principles and fully evaluating the facts to conclude that a work stoppage was protected activity when the employees took reasonable precautions to protect equipment even though the equipment was damaged