Raley's Supermarkets and Drug Centers

8 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.
369 U.S. 404 (1962) Cited 298 times
Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B
347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965) Cited 55 times
Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
Local 13, Detroit Newspaper, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
598 F.2d 267 (D.C. Cir. 1979) Cited 24 times
Clarifying that the good-faith requirement applies both to employer and union
Emeryville Ctr., Shell Dev. v. N.L.R.B
441 F.2d 880 (9th Cir. 1971) Cited 29 times
In Emeryville, the union requested salary grade curves, individual salaries, and merit ratings for 430 unit professional employees to enable the union "to bargain intelligently."
E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co. v. N.L.R.B
744 F.2d 536 (6th Cir. 1984) Cited 10 times 1 Legal Analyses
Nos. 82-1767, 82-1903. Argued April 3, 1984. Decided September 26, 1984. Alan G. Burton, argued, E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co., Legal Dept., Wilmington, Del., George E. Yund, Frost Jacobs, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, L. Pay Wynns, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON, District Judge. The Honorable Benjamin F. Gibson, United
Cook Paint Varnish Co. v. N.L.R.B
648 F.2d 712 (D.C. Cir. 1981) Cited 9 times
Holding that an employer may threaten an employee with discipline in seeking to compel compliance with investigatory questions regarding employee misconduct if the employer's inquiry is still in the investigatory stages
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Raley's Supermarkets and Drug Centers

8 Cited authorities

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

Clarifying that the good-faith requirement applies both to employer and union

In Emeryville, the union requested salary grade curves, individual salaries, and merit ratings for 430 unit professional employees to enable the union "to bargain intelligently."

Holding that an employer may threaten an employee with discipline in seeking to compel compliance with investigatory questions regarding employee misconduct if the employer's inquiry is still in the investigatory stages

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"