§
Rainbow Coaches

66 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 501 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.

    327 U.S. 251 (1946)   Cited 990 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"

  4. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 873 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  5. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 185 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

  7. O'Callahan v. Parker

    395 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 181 times
    Holding that when a serviceman is charged with a crime that is not "service connected" he is entitled to indictment by a grand jury and trial by jury in a civilian court

  8. Nathanson v. Labor Board

    344 U.S. 25 (1952)   Cited 279 times
    Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"

  9. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 328 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Emphasizing that the Board's remedial power "is not limited to the illustrative example of one type of permissible affirmative order," such as backpay, and cautioning that the "particular means by which the effects of unfair labor practices are to be expunged are matters 'for the Board not the courts to determine'" (first citing Phelps Dodge, 313 U.S. at 187, 189; then quoting Machinists, 311 U.S. at 82)

  10. Kalvar Corp. v. U.S.

    434 U.S. 830 (1977)   Cited 121 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting allegations of bad faith against government

  11. Section 92-50 to 92-52 - [Repealed]

    Haw. Rev. Stat. § 92-50 to 92-52   Cited 3 times

    HRS § 92-50 to 92-52 L 1988, c 262, §3.

  12. Section 3308 - Access to books, accounts, records, etc., by Council

    12 U.S.C. § 3308   Cited 1 times

    For the purpose of carrying out this chapter, the Council shall have access to all books, accounts, records, reports, files, memorandums, papers, things, and property belonging to or in use by Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies, including reports of examination of financial institutions or their holding companies from whatever source, together with workpapers and correspondence files related to such reports, whether or not a part of the report, and all without any deletions. 12 U

  13. Section 383-95 - Disclosure of information

    Haw. Rev. Stat. § 383-95

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, information obtained from any employing unit or individual pursuant to the administration of this chapter and determinations as to the benefit rights of any individual shall be held confidential and shall not be disclosed or be open to public inspection in any manner revealing the individual's or employing unit's identity. Any claimant (or the claimant's legal representative) shall be supplied with information from the records of the department to