§

R. J. Reynolds Foods, Inc.

168 N.L.R.B. 305 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
R. J. Reynolds Foods, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  5. Modern Manufacturing v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    344 U.S. 816 (1952)   Cited 27 times

    No. 54. Decided October 13, 1952. C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. James Barnes for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Finding and Mozart G. Ratner for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent. Reported below: 193 F. 2d 613.

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerset Classics

    193 F.2d 613 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 25 times

    No. 58, Docket 22081. Argued December 11, 1951. Decided January 14, 1952. Willis S. Ryza, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Dominick L. Manoli, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Walter J. Mahoney, of Buffalo, N.Y., and George Moskowitz, of New York City, for respondent Somerset Classics, Inc. Aaron L. Danzig

  7. Paramount Cap Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    260 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1958)   Cited 17 times

    No. 15985. October 24, 1958. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1958. John R. Stockham, St. Louis, Mo. (Stockham, Roth, Buder Martin, St. Louis, Mo., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Morris A. Solomon, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for respondent

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Ertel Manufacturing Corporation

    352 F.2d 916 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15062. October 19, 1965. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1965. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry P. Dees, Joseph A. Yocum, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and CASTLE, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. The Labor Board petitions for enforcement of its order issued against respondent and dated June 5, 1964. Respondent (Company) maintains a factory and place of business in

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Bedford-Nugent Corporation

    379 F.2d 528 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 3 times

    No. 15875. June 2, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry P. Dees, Joseph A. Yocum, Arthur R. Donovan, Evansville, Ind., for respondent, Kahn, Dees, Donovan Kahn, Evansville, Ind., of counsel. Before CASTLE and FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judges, and MAJOR, Senior Circuit Judge. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Monroe Feed Store

    237 F.2d 116 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 3 times

    No. 15047. September 21, 1956. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie Boyls, Francis Sperandeo, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Masters Masters, William J. Masters, Portland, Or., for respondent. Before HEALY, POPE, and LEMMON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This matter is before us on petition of the NLRB for enforcement of an order issued against respondent. The Board, in agreement with its trial examiner, found that respondent violated