§

Quality Packaging Products, Inc.

198 N.L.R.B. 1084 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Quality Packaging Products, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Soft Water Laundry, Inc.

    346 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 26 times

    No. 21303. June 15, 1965. Richard P. Lawlor, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jesse S. Hogg, Tampa, Fla., Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Tampa, Fla., of counsel, for respondent. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. GEWIN, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of an order issued against

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Delight Bakery, Inc.

    353 F.2d 344 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 25 times

    No. 16091. December 3, 1965. Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allen M. Hutter, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Jack R. Clary, Grand Rapids, Mich., Warner, Norcross Judd, by Thomas McNamara, Grand Rapids, Mich., on brief, for respondent. Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. EDWARDS, Circuit

  6. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  7. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    420 F.2d 1296 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 21797, 22090. Argued May 6, 1969. Decided June 20, 1969. Mr. Robert T. Snyder, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,797. Mr. Brown Hill Boswell, Charlotte, N.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C., was on the brief, for intervenors

  8. N.L.R.B. v. D'Armigene, Inc.

    353 F.2d 406 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 16 times

    No. 19, Docket 29535. Argued September 29, 1965. Decided November 22, 1965. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard M. Dworski, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Bertrand B. Pogrebin, Harry H. Rains, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent. Before FRIENDLY and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges, and BRYAN, District Judge. Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN

  9. N.L.R.B. v. General Industries Electronics Co.

    401 F.2d 297 (8th Cir. 1968)   Cited 13 times

    No. 19030. September 27, 1968. Burton L. Raimi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen., Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B. on the briefs. James W. Moore, of Smith, Williams, Friday Bowen, Little Rock, Ark., for respondent; B.S. Clark, Little Rock, Ark., on brief. Before MATTHES, LAY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Betts Baking Co.

    428 F.2d 156 (10th Cir. 1970)   Cited 11 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Betts Baking Co., 428 F.2d 156, 159 (10th Cir. 1970), the court wrote that the offer was valid despite the time restriction because "[w]e think that [the employee's] failure to complain of the time limitation precludes him from complaining of the reasonableness of the reporting time."